@article{oai:osu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002481,
 author = {土屋, 佑介 and 久保, 雄一郎 and 林部, 由香 and 吉﨑, 雅浩 and TSUCHIYA, Yusuke and KUBO, Yuichiro and HAYASHIBE, Yuka and YOSHIZAKI, Masahiro},
 issue = {2・3},
 journal = {大阪産業大学経営論集, OSAKA SANGYO UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION},
 month = {Jul},
 note = {The purpose of this article is to propose guidelines for qualitative research by organizing the discussion of Fisher and Aguinis（ 2017） who proposed an elaboration of the theory, and to offer a categorization of previous studies in Japanese management. First, we explain the three approaches and seven tactics underlying theoretical contributions, the decision-making process concluding in the adoption of discrimination, the elaboration of theory from theory generation to theory testing, and the six research conditions that situate problem consciousness. Next, we examine nine award-winning qualitative studies published in Japanese academic journals and offer a classification table we created. The trends observed are discussed. Finally, three points to be noted are mentioned when employing theory elaboration.},
 pages = {1--17},
 title = {Fisher and Aguinis（2017）における理論の精緻化},
 volume = {23},
 year = {2022},
 yomi = {ツチヤ, ユウスケ and クボ, ユウイチロウ and ハヤシベ, ユカ and ヨシザキ, マサヒロ}
}