@article{oai:osu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002280,
 author = {土屋, 佑介 and 辺見, 英貴 and TSUCHIYA, Yusuke and HEMMI, Hidetaka},
 issue = {2・3},
 journal = {大阪産業大学経営論集, OSAKA SANGYO UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION},
 month = {Jun},
 note = {The purpose of this research is to clarify the Gioia Methodology（Gioia, Corley, & Hamilton, 2012）,  which has attracted attention as a qualitative method.  Through a comparative  analysis with the Eisenhardt（1989）template, we divided it into five items; epistemological foundations and research orientation, the need for prior research, data collection, logic of the analysis, and rhetoric of the writing. As a result, we proposed a taxonomy that organized the commonalities     and differences between the two templates, and introduced a method to increase the rigor of case studies. Finally, we discussed three limitations in Gioia et al.（2012）.},
 pages = {1--14},
 title = {ケース・スタディの２つのテンプレート　―Eisenhardt（1989） と Gioia, Corley and Hamilton（2012） の比較検討―},
 volume = {21},
 year = {2020},
 yomi = {ツチヤ, ユウスケ and ヘンミ, ヒデタカ}
}