@article{oai:osu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002096,
 author = {谷口, 興紀 and TANIGUCHI, Okinori},
 issue = {129},
 journal = {大阪産業大学論集　自然科学編, JOURNAL OF OSAKA SANGYO UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC SOCIETY OF OSAKA SANGYO UNIVERSITY  Natural Sciences},
 month = {Jun},
 note = {Often discourse on landscape proceeds without reference to its background, namely the environment including things in their landscape. If the spatiotemporal boundary of the environment is made explicit it is referred to as“ the whole landscape picture.” In the case of Kyoto, its landscape picture would include descriptions accompanying the “picture” with which a viewer can convey to an“ other,” because it exists exterior to the“ viewer.”
　A rigorous reflection on the term“ whole” necessarily poses the question as to whether a speaker, as the viewer, is included in the whole landscape. A viewer must look at a landscape “in” the landscape itself. The whole landscape picture then arises from within the viewer as a“ landscape image” of Kyoto city, for example. In this case, it is logical to claim that the viewer cannot convey it to an “other,” because the viewer tries to do so while the image is an internal entity.
　A set of landscape elements is not the sum whole of the landscape. If in turn these are pictured, however, then the elements are given relationships with one another or “relatedness” among a corpus of elements. This action has the effect of transforming the set into an ensemble, which results in more than the sum of the elements, giving each particular element its locus in the picture. 
This paper attempts to illustrate this reflective thought process by using described and visual landscape elements of Kyoto.},
 pages = {31--75},
 title = {京都景観の「全体図」と「全体像」について　― 環境デザインの立場から ―},
 year = {2018},
 yomi = {タニグチ, オキノリ}
}