@article{oai:osu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001387,
 author = {谷口, 興紀 and タニグチ, オキノリ and TANIGUCHI, Okinori},
 journal = {大阪産業大学論集. 自然科学編},
 month = {Oct},
 note = {P(論文), Generally speaking, fundamental terms used in the Act are defined at top parts. In case of Landscape Act there is no definition of "landscape". Policy Scheme for the beautiful country-making which is in advance of it shows the term "landscape" by the ostensive definition using photos. Instead of the ostensive definition I propose the recursive definition of the term "good landscapes" using the prolog language. Because the successful landscape plans by local residents themselves who are composed of various and diversified careers are agreed only by a series of procedural steps, not by using technical terms and depending on experts' images. This is following the spirit of Landscape Act.},
 pages = {1--13},
 title = {「良好な景観」という用語について : 住民等による「景観計画素案」のための基礎的研究 その1},
 volume = {121},
 year = {2009}
}