{"created":"2023-06-20T13:02:55.279102+00:00","id":1244,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"3f245c12-b66b-4d3f-8ceb-a50837d2d70d"},"_deposit":{"created_by":10,"id":"1244","owners":[10],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"1244"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:osu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001244","sets":["12:13","12:13:28"]},"author_link":["2616","2617","2618"],"item_2_biblio_info_14":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2015-02","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"23","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"23","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"大阪産業大学論集. 人文・社会科学編","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"JOURNAL OF OSAKA SANGYO UNIVERSITY Humanities & Social Sciences","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_2_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(日)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"平尾, 昌宏","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_2_creator_7":{"attribute_name":"著者名よみ","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"ヒラオ, マサヒロ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_2_creator_8":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"HIRAO, Masahiro","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_2_description_1":{"attribute_name":"ページ属性","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"P(論文)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_description_11":{"attribute_name":"抄録(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿は前稿に続く,日本語を糧とした哲学的な思索の試みである。日本語や日本文化を論じる近年の哲学的試みには安易な一般化,飛躍が見られる。そこで前稿では確かな地歩を築くため,問題を「いる/ある」両動詞の用法に絞り,空虚な思弁を避けるため,国語学,日本語学研究を参照した。従来「いる」と「ある」の使い分けは,これらの動詞が述語づけられる主語のカテゴリーと,話者の認識という二つの観点から論じられてきた。だが,この二つの見解はともに厳密には成り立たない。そこで前稿末尾では,両動詞の使い分けは話者と主語との関係を示すという新たな仮説を提示した。本稿では,この仮説と従来の二説との関係を考察し,次の諸点を指摘する。(1)これら三説中でわれわれの仮説が最も一般的で,従来の二説を包括できること,(2)しかし,その一般性の故に,われわれの仮説はまだ内実を欠くこと,(3)ただ,従来の二説をわれわれの仮説に基づいた例文解釈のパラメータとして利用できることである。","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_description_12":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"In this paper following the previous one, we present a philosophical consideration based on Japanese language. In our previous paper, we have examined conventional studies, in which two points of view had been presented. According to some researchers, the difference between 'iru' and 'aru' is based on the category of subject of these verbs(what the subject is), and according to others, the difference of 'iru' and 'aru' is based on the attitudes of speakers(how the speaker think or feel). In conclusion, we have proved that these opinions both are not decisive and showen the third way or hypothesis, that is, the difference of 'iru' and 'aru' is based on the relations between the speaker and the subject. In this paper, we consider the relationship between this hypothesis and the conventional two theories, to point out: (1) our hypothesis can subsume conventional theories. (2) But our theory, because of its generality, is too abstract to explain contents of example sentences concretely. (3) Therefore utilizing conventional theories as the parameters to interpret examples for our hypotheses is needed.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_2_relation_13":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"1882-5966","subitem_relation_type_select":"EISSN"}}]},"item_2_source_id_13":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12289436","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_2_text_2":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"論文"}]},"item_2_text_3":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Article"}]},"item_2_text_9":{"attribute_name":"著者所属(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"大阪産業大学教養部非常勤"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2015-02-01"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KJ00009642801.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"660.0 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://osu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/1244/files/KJ00009642801.pdf"},"version_id":"4f7103ff-3875-43af-a4c1-7e625663f6fa"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"<<いる>> : 日本語からの哲学・試論(2)","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"<<いる>> : 日本語からの哲学・試論(2)","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"'Iru'. A philosophical investigation based on Japanese language(Part II)","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"2","owner":"10","path":["28","13"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2015-02-01"},"publish_date":"2015-02-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"1244","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["<<いる>> : 日本語からの哲学・試論(2)"],"weko_creator_id":"10","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-12-25T07:18:46.019427+00:00"}