WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "9e393cc7-f197-4a02-9d76-2d72b9f35675"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 10, "id": "2280", "owners": [10], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "2280"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:osu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002280", "sets": ["20", "480", "482"]}, "author_link": ["4205", "4204", "4206", "4207"], "item_10002_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2020-06-30", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "2・3", "bibliographicPageEnd": "14", "bibliographicPageStart": "1", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "21", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "大阪産業大学経営論集"}, {"bibliographic_title": "OSAKA SANGYO UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10002_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": " The purpose of this research is to clarify the Gioia Methodology(Gioia, Corley, \u0026 Hamilton, 2012), which has attracted attention as a qualitative method. Through a comparative analysis with the Eisenhardt(1989)template, we divided it into five items; epistemological foundations and research orientation, the need for prior research, data collection, logic of the analysis, and rhetoric of the writing. As a result, we proposed a taxonomy that organized the commonalities and differences between the two templates, and introduced a method to increase the rigor of case studies. Finally, we discussed three limitations in Gioia et al.(2012).", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10002_publisher_8": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "大阪産業大学学会"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_11": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA11394617", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1345-1456", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "土屋, 佑介"}, {"creatorName": "ツチヤ, ユウスケ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "4204", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "辺見, 英貴"}, {"creatorName": "ヘンミ, ヒデタカ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "4205", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "TSUCHIYA, Yusuke", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "4206", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "HEMMI, Hidetaka", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "4207", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-10-23"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "01-14_土屋.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.4 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1400000.0, "url": {"label": "01-14_土屋", "url": "https://osu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2280/files/01-14_土屋.pdf"}, "version_id": "0609e1c5-5b94-40dd-aafb-5a494baf2f6a"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "ケース・スタディ", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "テンプレート", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "質的研究方法", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "比較検討", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Case Studies", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Template", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Qualitative Method", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Comparative Analysis", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "ケース・スタディの2つのテンプレート ―Eisenhardt(1989) と Gioia, Corley and Hamilton(2012) の比較検討―", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "ケース・スタディの2つのテンプレート ―Eisenhardt(1989) と Gioia, Corley and Hamilton(2012) の比較検討―"}, {"subitem_title": "Two Templates of Case Studies: Comparing Eisenhardt(1989) and Gioia, Corley and Hamilton(2012)", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10002", "owner": "10", "path": ["20", "480", "482"], "permalink_uri": "https://osu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2280", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2020-10-23"}, "publish_date": "2020-10-23", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "2280", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["ケース・スタディの2つのテンプレート ―Eisenhardt(1989) と Gioia, Corley and Hamilton(2012) の比較検討―"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
ケース・スタディの2つのテンプレート ―Eisenhardt(1989) と Gioia, Corley and Hamilton(2012) の比較検討―
https://osu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2280
https://osu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2280a8e838fb-fcb7-4b50-a474-f40111675eb4
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
01-14_土屋 (1.4 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2020-10-23 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | ケース・スタディの2つのテンプレート ―Eisenhardt(1989) と Gioia, Corley and Hamilton(2012) の比較検討― | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | Two Templates of Case Studies: Comparing Eisenhardt(1989) and Gioia, Corley and Hamilton(2012) | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | ケース・スタディ | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | テンプレート | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 質的研究方法 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 比較検討 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Case Studies | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Template | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Qualitative Method | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Comparative Analysis | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
土屋, 佑介
× 土屋, 佑介× 辺見, 英貴× TSUCHIYA, Yusuke× HEMMI, Hidetaka |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | The purpose of this research is to clarify the Gioia Methodology(Gioia, Corley, & Hamilton, 2012), which has attracted attention as a qualitative method. Through a comparative analysis with the Eisenhardt(1989)template, we divided it into five items; epistemological foundations and research orientation, the need for prior research, data collection, logic of the analysis, and rhetoric of the writing. As a result, we proposed a taxonomy that organized the commonalities and differences between the two templates, and introduced a method to increase the rigor of case studies. Finally, we discussed three limitations in Gioia et al.(2012). | |||||
書誌情報 |
大阪産業大学経営論集 en : OSAKA SANGYO UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 巻 21, 号 2・3, p. 1-14, 発行日 2020-06-30 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 大阪産業大学学会 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 1345-1456 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA11394617 |